What is the "one thing" of experience for which the boundaries are not clear?

from [/unnamedcamp/what is the “one thing” of experience for which the boundaries are not clear?](https://scrapbox.io/unnamedcamp/what is the “one thing” of experience for which the boundaries are not clear?)

• [/nishio/evergreen note should be atomic](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/evergreen note should be atomic).

  • Evergreen Notes should be [atomic

    • Notebooks are

      • write about one thing only.

      • However, as much as possible

      • Write so that the whole picture of the matter can be grasped.

      • ’s the best

  • What is “one” in the case of “one”?
  • The human experience is a blur without clear boundaries that can be thick in places.
    • 
      • from [/nishio/“Experiencing Processes and Creating Meaning” Study Group 2#61fb726eaff09e00007d64b4](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/“Experiencing Processes and Creating Meaning” Study Group 2#61fb726eaff09e00007d64b4)
    • If you try to describe the dense areas of this diagram, how much of it is “just one thing” and how much is “the whole of that thing”?
    • You claim it’s “best if it’s ~ and ~,” but is that feasible?
      • A clear boundary can be achieved by wrapping only one grain.
      • Seems unfeasible for something that has no clear boundaries.
  • This “should be atomic” is
    • It’s not, “You can always be atomic, so you should try to be atomic.”
    • I think it’s, “There are a lot of things you can’t do atomically, but hopefully you can make it as atomic as possible.”

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/境界が明確でない経験の「一つの事柄」とは何か？ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.